Doctors & Nutrition
Dr. Philip Binzel in Alive and Well asks:
Is there any hope that nutritional therapy will ever be accepted by the
medical profession? In my opinion, it is not a matter of “if”, it is only a
matter of “when.” As a patient of mine said to me several years ago,
“If doctors in this country don’t start going to nutrition, the patients are
going to stop going to the doctors.” The use of nutrition in the
prevention and treatment of disease will come from the ground up,
not from the top down. People are getting more nutritionally oriented
and are going to insist that their doctors do the same.
In regard to the treatment of cancer with nutritional therapy, before
this comes about, two things are going to have to happen:
- The medical profession is going to have to realize that they have
been treating the wrong thing. They are going to have to realize that,
as long as they continue to treat just the tumor alone, they are going
to continue to get the same poor results that they have always had.
- The medical profession is going to have to accept the fact that the
quality and quantity of life for the cancer patient obtained through
nutritional therapy is far superior to anything available through our
present modalities. In simpler terms, these people on nutritional
therapy feel better and live longer.
I, most certainly, do not want to leave the impression that everything
about nutrition that can be known is now known. The very opposite is
true. We have only just begun to scratch the surface of our
understanding of the relationship between nutrition and disease. It is
my opinion that we must first understand the defense mechanisms of
the body. Why do these defense mechanisms respond so rapidly in
some situations and so slowly in others? What systems of the body
are involved in the defense mechanisms? In what order do they
respond? Once we have the answer to these questions we can then
determine what nutritional ingredients are necessary to keep those
systems of the body functioning normally.
The fact that we do not have the answers to the above-stated
questions does not mean, however, that we should not use the
information that we do have to its fullest extent. The pure medical
scientist will not use any form of treatment until he fully understands
why it works and how it works. The good practitioner, on the other
hand, will use any form of treatment that works, even if he does not
understand exactly why and how it works.
There are many examples of good practitioners in the annals of
medical history. Dr. Semmelweis, in 1860, insisted that all doctors
wash their hands before delivering a baby because, by so doing, it
eliminated “child bed fever.” He knew it worked, but he did not know
why or how it worked. He was removed from the hospital staff and
ostracized by the medical community. It was not until about the time
that Dr. Semmelweis died in 1865 that Dr. Lister discovered bacteria.
Dr. Lister was able to prove that Dr. Semmelweis was right and why
he was right. I doubt that Dr. Fleming in 1925 knew why he could
cure pneumonia by giving his patients moldy bread. He knew it
worked, but he did not know why or how it worked. It wasn’t until
some time later that he discovered a fungus in moldy bread that could
kill certain bacteria. This fungus eventually became known as
penicillin. Dr. Fleming was ridiculed by the medical profession for his
work. It would be another fifteen years before penicillin came into
use. By then, thousands of patients had died from pneumonia.
So it is with nutritional therapy in the treatment of cancer. I hope in
this book that I have been able to present sufficient evidence to show
that it works, even though at this time we do not know exactly why
and how it works.
After all is said and done, the true measurement of a good physician
is not necessarily how much he knows. It is, instead, how willing he is
to search for, find and then use whatever forms of treatment, which in
his opinion, will give his patients the very best chance to remain…
ALIVE AND WELL.
I had read Alive and Well twice. Is this page still active?
yes, JuanMateo, nancysniche.com is still active. can i be of help?
Do you think apricot kernels can be a good substitute for the b17 capsules and IV? And how much seeds per day?
Actually, JuanMateo, B17 (amygdalin) capsules, better known as Laetrile, are derived from apricot kernels… so yes, they are a good substitute. However, i do suggest a Navarro HCG titre as results would determine the proper amount or dosage. Dr. Manuel Navarro advised my Mother to snack on bitter apricot kernels, one (1) kernel per 10 pounds of her body weight. Mama was less than 5 feet tall and of small frame – at just a 100 pounds, that allowed her 10 kernels. Though supposed to be taken in 3 divided doses after meals, Mama, doctor as she was, took the instruction literally and relished her 5 kernels as she snacked on them in between meals. For more info, world without cancer.org.uk – B17 Metabolic Therapy: Therapies and Protocols.
Am so so sorry for this very delayed reply, JuanMateo.